Men's 8 In Vibram Thermostatic Arctic Grip Pro Composite Toe Composite Plate Waterproof Work Boots

Men's 8 In Vibram Thermostatic Arctic Grip Pro Composite Toe Composite Plate Waterproof Work Boots is rated 3.4 out of 5 by 37.
  • y_2020, m_7, d_10, h_15
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_3.0.10
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_2, tr_35
  • loc_en_CA, sid_101469, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=HELPFULNESS, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=POSITIVE_FEEDBACK, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_marks
  • bvseo_sdk, java_sdk, bvseo-3.1.0
  • CLOUD, getAggregateRating, 32ms
  • REVIEWS, PRODUCT

Add to cart

Want it today?

Description

With composite toes and plates, these CAT safety shoes have full-grain leather uppers and waterproof membranes. They’re insulated with Thinsulate™ for lightweight warmth and feature EASE insoles, engineered for cushioned comfort. The boots have PU moulded midsoles and Vibram Arctic Grip Pro rubber outsoles for improved grip and traction on wet and icy terrain.


Ranked by the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute as a top slip-resistant winter boot. Click here for more details.

Style: P721620

Features

  • FULL GRAIN LEATHER UPPER
  • PADDED COLLAR
  • WATERPROOF MEMBRANE
  • 400G THINSULATE™ INSULATION
  • EASE ENGINEERED INSOLES
    Cushioned for added comfort
  • PU MOULDED MIDSOLE
  • VIBRAM ARCTIC GRIP PRO RUBBER OUTSOLE
    Advanced cold weather gripping system
  • SAFETY FIRST
    Composite toe, composite plate
  • LACE-UP STYLE
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Good if you don't plan to work with those They look good and a pretty confortable work booy but the do not last long if you work with them after less than a month the stiches of the sole are gone or really weak so. They dont worth the price if you plan to used them for real work. And They are really waterproof. They're good week end boots but not good for real work
Date published: 2018-12-12
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Wouldn't buy again For the the price point I expected longer life span from the product. I bought them in January and by June the heel had completely let go from the sole. What a waste of money.
Date published: 2018-09-20
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Really Disappointed I am so let down by these boots! My husband is an industrial commercial electrician who logs about 13km of walking in boots per day. Usually I buy him Dakota boots every 6 months, which are almost the same price but are heavy. I was super excited to find the composite toe on a narrower fitting and lighter boot! Too bad they ripped across the toe cap seam by day 3. Would never recommend or repurchase I definitely expected more from a $300 pair of boots.
Date published: 2018-07-21
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Great Start But Short Lived I bought they for framing and was very happy with them. They were great on the roof, very warm and extremely though. Unfortunately they started to fail after 4 month. First the sole crack across the forefoot right into the insole and then one of the lace eyes ripped off. The inside back of the boot also tore away. For almost $300 I expected much better life. Marks did how ever offer an exchange which was very helpful.
Date published: 2018-11-07
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Excellent Product. I purchased these boots looking for extreme weather proof and to with stand extremely working conditions. I was not diappointed as these high quality boots meet the rugged demand. Very comfortable also. I would recommend these to my colleagues.
Date published: 2018-06-01
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Super comfortable! I bought this in time for the first snow and must say that I am extremely satisfied with my purchase. These boots are not only the most comfortable I have ever owned, but they are quite warm for winter, and the sole is very good in snow or on icy surfaces. They appear to be a bit bulky (which work boot isn't?), but feel very light on your feet.
Date published: 2017-12-15
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Hard not to re-buy the new model I bought these in 2014 mainly because it worked with my foot and gave me the support I needed. I was hesitant at first buying a CAT boot, but I needed something that would work in snow and cold temps as well as rain and mud. I would use rubber boots on the really deep or really wet and muddy days but these were great ankle support when I had to walk 12 km/day and kept me warm and dry. However: The toe did end up cracking after about 6 months - 1 year of use. Which was actually a manufacture defect the way it cracked. Mark's honoured their warranty and started me over with a fresh pair and I am still using them today in 2019. Some of the eyelets are pulled off, and there are cracks again, but after 4 years of use, it is time to buy a new pair and it will be hard not to buy them again. It looks like the new model (2019) have changed the toe cap design, hopefully fixing the cracking issues I had. Overall I would rate them 7/10 mainly because they fit my foot and gave me the support I needed. Kept me warm and dry as well, but I had the cracking issues, which Mark's made it easy to deal with fortunately.
Date published: 2019-10-21
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Horrible boots! These boots were great for the first 6 wish months, grip well on oily floors in the shop. Keep in mind 6 months. I went to work today, right after lunch the sole SPLIT boot is completely garbage now. I work as a mechanic so now I have to go buy ANOTHER pair of boots. Ive had a few pairs of CAT work boots, I will NEVER buy another pair. Worst quality I've ever had. $300 bucks for all of 6 months.
Date published: 2019-07-10
  • y_2020, m_7, d_10, h_15
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_3.0.10
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_2, tr_35
  • loc_en_CA, sid_101469, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=HELPFULNESS, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=POSITIVE_FEEDBACK, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_marks
  • bvseo_sdk, java_sdk, bvseo-3.1.0
  • CLOUD, getReviews, 36ms
  • REVIEWS, PRODUCT
  • bvseo_sdk, java_sdk, bvseo-3.1.0
  • CLOUD, getContent, 228ms
  • QUESTIONS, PRODUCT
  • bvseo-msg: The resource to the URL or file is currently unavailable.;