Men's 6114 Quad Comfort 6 In Steel Toe Composite Plate Work Boots

Men's 6114 Quad Comfort 6 In Steel Toe Composite Plate Work Boots is rated 2.8 out of 5 by 32.
  • y_2020, m_7, d_3, h_15
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_3.0.9
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_11, tr_21
  • loc_en_CA, sid_277303, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=HELPFULNESS, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=POSITIVE_FEEDBACK, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_marks
  • bvseo_sdk, java_sdk, bvseo-3.1.0
  • CLOUD, getAggregateRating, 26ms
  • REVIEWS, PRODUCT

Add to cart

Want it today?

Description

A classic leather work boot from Dakota. They support your feet with four comfort components addressing shock absorption, weight distribution, cushioning and pressure displacement. Everyday wear can be hard on your work boots - that’s why these are built with an invisible antimicrobial treatment to inhibit the growth of fungi, mold and mildew, as well as odour-causing bacteria. These men’s work boots meet CSA Grade 1 requirements for toe and underfoot protection. They’re also electric shock resistant. Bottomed out with Tarantula Anti-Slip® rubber outsoles, these boots provide the ultimate in slip protection by reducing the likelihood that you’ll slip or fall on wet and/or greasy surfaces.

Style: 5ANBDK9-6114

Features

  • FULL GRAIN LEATHER UPPER
  • T-MAX® INSULATION
    Maximum warmth & superior comfort
  • FRESHTECH®
    Treated to inhibit the growth of odour and stain causing bacteria
  • QUAD COMFORT®
    A better way to walk
  • PADDED COLLAR
  • PULL LOOP
  • POURED PU WELT MIDSOLE
  • SAFETY FIRST
    CSA Grade 1 steel toe, composite plate. Puncture resistant. Electric shock resistant
  • TARANTULA ANTI-SLIP® RUBBER OUTSOLE
    A safer way to walk
  • LACE-UP STYLE
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Completely different shoe! I've been buying these shoes every season for almost 6 years. They used to be nice and wide with no friction points- SUPER COMFORTABLE. The Dakota's across the board have gone down dramatically in quality. In these the front toe box stitching now moves through the inside of the shoe causing friction on tp of the big toe. The stitching to the outside of the foot has moved further forward causing friction on the side of the middle foot. And finally the neck of the shoe- what is going on with the padding of lack of?? What happened to these absolute beauties?? The whole redesign doesn't work for anyone who bought these shoes originally. Bring back the wide fit, open up the toe box, and put back the cozy tongue and neck for christ's sake. There are enough shoes out there for the narrower foot. My two cents worth.
Date published: 2020-03-04
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Not as comfortable As the old version The old version of these boots were much more comfortable . These are not padded by the eye holes and rub against your foot making it even less comfortable... I prefer the old brand for sure ...
Date published: 2019-12-08
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Great fitting boot - BUT The hook used for a lace retainer chews laces. Go through a pair of laces in a couple of weeks. Also the padding around the top deteriorates & falls apart within a year.
Date published: 2020-03-19
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Very disapointed I both this 2 months ago and I cant get use to them. The older version were more comfortable, durable and nicer looking. Please bring back the old version!
Date published: 2020-02-18
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Good boots These boots are very comfortable and look good. The sole seems bigger than my last pair but are not getting in the way.
Date published: 2020-01-28
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Not the same as old boot Husband has been wearing these for years. Bought them back he couldn’t wear them. Not like the old boots at all.
Date published: 2020-01-02
Rated 2 out of 5 by from They’ve changed them I’ve worn these boots exclusively for over 10 years. I buy a new pair every year before winter. Dakota “changed” these boots. Very stiff and uncomfortable, feels heavier then before. Took me over a month of wearing around the house and yard to break in before even attempting to wear for a day of work. Very disappointing, will not buy these again.
Date published: 2020-04-15
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Top problems I bought these boots a year ago and they are built good mostly,comfortable and decent quality the one problem is the top of boot is bad quality
Date published: 2020-02-27
  • y_2020, m_7, d_3, h_15
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_3.0.9
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_11, tr_21
  • loc_en_CA, sid_277303, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=HELPFULNESS, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=POSITIVE_FEEDBACK, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_marks
  • bvseo_sdk, java_sdk, bvseo-3.1.0
  • CLOUD, getReviews, 78ms
  • REVIEWS, PRODUCT
  • bvseo_sdk, java_sdk, bvseo-3.1.0
  • CLOUD, getContent, 51ms
  • QUESTIONS, PRODUCT
  • bvseo-msg: The resource to the URL or file is currently unavailable.;