DH

Men's Bourke Boots

Men's Bourke Boots is rated 3.2 out of 5 by 13.
  • y_2019, m_11, d_10, h_22
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_3.0.0
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_1, tr_12
  • loc_en_CA, sid_103200, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=HELPFULNESS, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=POSITIVE_FEEDBACK, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_marks
  • bvseo_sdk, java_sdk, bvseo-3.1.0
  • CLOUD, getAggregateRating, 33ms
  • REVIEWS, PRODUCT
or

Description

A great DH leather-look boot with a dressy vibe, the Bourke will keep your feet warm and comfortable this winter. They’ll protect you from the cold with our T-MAX® light and warm insulation. Built for comfort, the boots feature memory foam cushioning and padding around the collar. The lacing system on these boots includes metal grommets for durability.

Style: 5CPBDHF18-C2472

Features

  • SYNTHETIC UPPER

  • T-MAX INSULATION®


    Our lightest, warmest insulation
  • LEATHER INSOLE WITH MEMORY FOAM CUSHIONING

  • PADDED COLLAR

  • LACE-UP STYLE

Rated 1 out of 5 by from Not Quality Winter Boot: Wear and tear prone I bought this product in October 2018, it started to fall apart by early December where the fake leather skin began wearing out on the welts of the boot. I had to superglue the fake leather skin back to the shoes black shell so it did not look as cheap. The only pros about this boot is its casual/leathery look, slightly waterproof, and slight insulation only suitable up to -7 C. I don't expect these boots to last until the end February 2019. I would recommend paying the extra $100.00 for other stylish winter boots than buying this non-quality pair. Overall waste of money, and would not recommend anyone to buy.
Date published: 2019-01-09
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Comfortable My grandson said they were very comfortable but the material is peeling off
Date published: 2018-12-16
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Not recommended I bought these boots 6 months ago, and within the first month the outer material started to peel off. By month 3 the right boot lace needed to be replaced because it tore, and month 5 the left boot lace. By month 4 (of wearing maybe twice a week this whole time btw) the sole started to rub off, and a hole small enough to allow water in had formed, but so small that I can't find it to cover it. I can now no longer wear them when raining, or snowing, because my feet get wet and freeze.
Date published: 2018-12-28
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Excellent boot Got this a month ago and love it. Very comfortable and looks nice in dressy or casual attire.
Date published: 2019-01-01
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Great boots! Bought these for my son. He loves them! Nice looking boots.
Date published: 2018-12-10
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Love them! Warm, comfortable, and stylish. I bought them for a casual winter boot, and they are pretty warm. I usually wear jeans with them and they look really good with them. They are also very comfortable when worn in, which only takes a couple of days.
Date published: 2018-11-15
Rated 1 out of 5 by from If I could give it 0 stars I would. I bought this garbage product by DH. It lasted me 14 wearings. I bought it for a trip to India, and had to have everything re-stitched to reassemble it while in Darjeeling. Worst boot I have ever purchased in my life. Completely self-destructs.
Date published: 2019-01-06
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Really warm, but not durable and fall apart too fa I was really intrigued by the look of these boots as they look durable, appear to offer good support and seem well made. Not to mention the sole looked grippy and the boot itself has a high ankle - both of which are advantages in the cold wet climate I reside in. Unfortunately after approximately 90 days after the purchase the seams where the sole and the upper boot meet - the seams began to separate. The seams became so bad that water easily made it's way into the interior of the boot, and looked terrible. Once I realized how bad the problem was it was too late - I was past the 100 day return policy & the boots couldn't be returned. I do believe that for the price and the fact these are boots sold in a place that sells work specific clothing - the boots should've lasted much longer than they did. I bought them for work - an environment where I was required to walk alot however it was within an office environment (the boots weren't subjected to obtuse conditions). Unfortunately the boots didn't stand the test of time - they barely held together for 3 months. Overall I would say these boots are intended for very light use - not everyday use or walking.
Date published: 2018-12-04
  • y_2019, m_11, d_10, h_22
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_3.0.0
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_1, tr_12
  • loc_en_CA, sid_103200, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=HELPFULNESS, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=POSITIVE_FEEDBACK, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_marks
  • bvseo_sdk, java_sdk, bvseo-3.1.0
  • CLOUD, getReviews, 188ms
  • REVIEWS, PRODUCT
  • bvseo_sdk, java_sdk, bvseo-3.1.0
  • CLOUD, getContent, 63ms
  • QUESTIONS, PRODUCT
  • bvseo-msg: The resource to the URL or file is currently unavailable.;